Dammed if you do, Dammed if you don't

A moment etched in my memory, as the ball glanced off of Sherringham's head, the world for me stood still for what seemed like an eternity, before a baby faced Norwegian stuck out his foot, directing the ball into the Munich net, confirming their defeat in one of the greatest comeback stories of all time. Ole, having made his name the seasons before as a "super sub" ensured that he would be remembered as nothing less, in what was the most memorable of substitute appearances for the club.

 It was almost fitting that he be given the opportunity to manage the club that made him a legend, as somewhat of a substitute, replacing Jose Mourinho midway through the season as caretaker/manager, tasked with salvaging what he could from the remaining games as a temporary replacement. Was this a bit of nostalgia from United hierarchy ? Was this maybe their chance to see Ole's impact late into a game? Well they def got a glimpse of his impact, as United under his reign went 14 wins from 19 games, winning the manager of the month along the way, and famously overturning a 2-0 deficit at the hands of PSG to progress to the next round. Things were looking great, and United fans from the 90's began to get a tingly feeling again that had left them since the day Sir Alex decided to leave the dugout for good. On March 28th 2019, however, Ole was appointed as permanent manager on a three year contract, and this was met with some skepticism from many United fans, given the state of the team, and the previous three managers before him eventual demise.

Ole began his reign the right way. Coming from the Fergie Era, he knew the level of fitness required, and embarked on a rigorous fitness program to ensure his players, if not as technically gifted as others in the league, were at least at a higher fitness level, ensuring the possibility of the late surge his United career was built on. His demeanor and preference for youth and pace was a welcomed change, as he relegated players to the bench who were not part of his plans. Romelu Lukaku being one of the unfortunate casualties to his new style of play, much to the delight of huge sections of the fan base who were left frustrated by his lack of technical ability on the field. Of course, the same fans who rejoiced as he was sold, are now upset at the board for selling him, as he performs at a world beater level at Inter Milan in Italy. But such is the fickle mentality of the United fan base spoilt by years of silverware and bragging rights. Nothing seems good enough, and nothing can happen quickly enough to please the belly of the beast.



Inheritance
The voices of United fans were starting to rise in decibel levels, twitter fingers started to regain speed and strength, much like Trinidadians do the months before Carnival. We have seen it before. A new manager comes in, bringing with him renewed hope, and before confirming if new management would bring a prolonged period of dominance, as is the norm, United fans begin to talk. Commonly used phrases of "20" or "Knocked you off you perch" or "most trophies in England" started to trend in football picong conversations once again. However, this was short lived, as the problems in United's squad started to show once again. 3 different managers over 12 different transfer windows had assembled a mix match of players brought in to fill certain gaps in the formation and tactics of the manager at the time. Ole had inherited a callaloo of sorts, with a little bit of everything, but by no means a title winning team. An aging backline, average youth products, mediocre creativity were Fergie's players, who managed to perform under the World class management and motivation of Sir Alex. Under Moyes, United had just finished winning their 20th title the season before, in what would be the last season under the great Sir Alex. By no means the greatest team at his disposal, but such was the lack of competition at the time United were able to stride to the finish line with relative ease. Taking over from Sir Alex was never going to be easy, and any transfers made would be heavily sructinzed unlike those of Sir Alex who could do no wrong. The singings of Bebe, Manucho, Tosic, Prunier, Kleberson Djemba-Djemba, Forlan, Obertan & Bellion seemed to have been forgotten, and were never met with the dismay and angst of that of Felliani, and other transfers post Fergie. It was a sign that the United fan base was not ready to step out the spotlight. They were not ready for the cycle to start, for the eventual drop from glory before they can be rebuilt to a powerhouse. It has happened so many times, to so many clubs who have dominated for long spells. Its impossible to maintain, and almost inevitable.

The Board
The appointment of David Moyes was seen as the first misstep by the new scapegoat for United's demise, The Board. The "Board" became a hooded figure of mystery, gaining infamy through every decision which was seen as ill advised and detrimental to the progression of the club. Ed Woodward was now the man behind the cloak to most fans, made to be as evil as Emperor Palpatine whos identity was really Sith lord Darth Sidious. This wheeling and dealing Woodward initially was seen as a Hero, and became a wildly popular meme amongst United fans for his ability to get talents such as Juan Mata to switch the blue of Chelsea for the Red of Manchester. However his reputation quickly went sour, as the lack of activity, and prolonged transfer sagas started to become headline news more often than not. United were under the spotlight, as they had been for so many years, but somehow the stories that we knew were made up under Fergie, all seemed plausible as supermarket tabloid journalists and writers had a field day, linking any player under the sun to the club, as they searched to rebuild. This built up the hopes of Many Glory hunting fans who had joined the bandwagon in the hay day of Fergie era. The possibility of signing Gareth Bale, Neymar, Thiago Alcantara, Dybala, Isco, Kroos and even a return for CR7 have all made headlines, and created a lack of confidence in "The Board" but the question is were the club ever in for such players in the first place, and if they were, are such transfers even feasible. Such has been the media influence over the new fan base of United fans. They have been able to create excitement with names being thrown around at will, without any credibility to the stories, and with the eventual non transfer simultaneously creating lack of confidence in those entrusted with transfers. The fans have become the epitomy of backseat drivers, who seem to know what the club needs more than those who are at the helm. Fans who have never played a team sport in their lives, or been part of a competitive football team, seemingly now tactical experts from their 5 consecutive seasons on FIFA ultimate team, calling for players to be purchased, without knowing the ins and out of transfer and contract policy, not to mention the added confusion of footballing agents in most deals. Manchester United were never a club to spend 200mill in a season on players, relying on specific small fees for problem areas, and the occasional large sum for a possible future superstar ala Rooney. But times  have changed. The club is still huge draw for players, although falling significantly in the pecking order for preferred destinations of potential players. The allure of playing in the Champions League is not assured on a season to season basis, given the rise of Liverpool and City along with the likes of Leicester, Chelsea and Tottenham (lets not mention Arsenal). The world class manager who can progress a players career has gone, and only under Jose have we had that "star power" manager who players may want to learn from, although his tactics are outdated, and his public bust ups with numerous teams were seen as a negative for many potential stars. The style of play over the past 6 years has been negative, labored and defensive, again not very enticing.
The Board have spent big in the past 6/7 years, not only in transfer fees to attract talent sought after by the manager at the time, but in wages also to encourage them to sign. This admittedly has created a much larger problem. At no time should a United fan claim that the Board has not supported the club's manager in the transfer window. Juan Mata, Di Maria, Shaw, Hererram Falcao, Blind, Martial, Schneiderlin, Depay, Darmian, Schweinsteiger, Pogba, Mkhitaryan, Zlatan, Bailly, Lukaku, Sanchez, Matic, Lindelof, Fred, Maguire and Wan-Bissaka all sparked excitement and dared fans to dream. These are huge transfers for any club, and somehow the fickle mentality of fans has again led to the blame of the performance of these talents on " The Board". Not one of these players signed were in demise, or playing poorly and were "not of United quality" yet a couple months in, almost all have received criticism from parts of the stands and United global fan base of "experts" as they underperform. Again is this the fault of the board? Have they not done what was asked? Signed world class talents or potential talents? Paid them well to ensure they sign? Given them world class training facilities and managers to take them to the top? What else can be blame the board for other than exorbitant wages which have created somewhat of a problem internally.

The Problems
Currently United find themselves in a January transfer window, with a team riddled with injuries to key players, and little on the bench in terms of depth, with poor results piling up, and pressure mounting on what by all accounts is an inexperienced and youthful team. United boast an attacking front three of Rashford, Martial & James, backed with Mason Greenwood, Jesse Lingard and Andreas Pereira on the bench doesn't exactly strike fear into opposition defenses. But is this the fault of the board? United fans seem to forget that Ole wanted Lukaku sold as he didn't fit into his plans, and Alexeis Sanchez lack of form prompted him to be loaned out to free up  a bit of the wage bill. At no point did Ole ask to the public for a replacement, instead claiming he is happy with what he has. Ole is to blame for this situation, regardless of what the tabloids report as potential transfers in the attacking positions. The defense has been upgraded rather expensively and again has not performed as well as we the fans would like. Midfield however, blame can lie with the board. Weather Ole has asked for reinforcements or not, and weather the targeted players are attainable or not is another question, but the board should have noticed the problem area, and at least made a more concerted effort to strengthen in the summer, rather than the labored attempts at present for Bruno Fernandes who day to day seems less likely to join. Such is the problem however that the board has created, and is ultimately trying to fix. The wages and fees paid in the past have lead clubs to demand the highest fee as its an easy "Payday". Players & agents have the same idea and have held the club to ransom, knowing their desperation to sign them, and willingness to pay over the odds.
The board, have noticed this, and have actively under Ole been trying to fix the problem. Getting rid of dead weight is the first step in fixing the club. Mediocre players, or players past their prime need to be cleared out, but the wages that they are paid at united is the biggest stumbling block in securing moves away, and other clubs cant afford to pay what United have paid. The board have also taken a stance it seems on the apparent holding to ransom by clubs, as is seen in the prolonged Bruno saga, which is frustrating to many fans given the importance this players need is to top 4 hopes, but is a necessary action to ensure United aren't hit with World record fees in the summer for their other targets. ITs a process, and although frustrating and lengthy, should pay dividends.

Motivation

It seems that Ole Gunnar and his team lack motivation, and by extension confidence. This comes only with proper management, teamwork and of course a good run of winning games. Ole, as much as I would like him to succeed and hope he is given a bit longer to try and implement his plan once he clears out and rebuilds, seems to be out of his depth as a manager. His clear & obvious tactic of counter attacking football with a pacey front three is exciting, but clear also that there is no plan B. An early goal against, seems to be a death sentence as the young boys more often than not, put their heads down in disappointment. This is obvious of lack of motivation and confidence instilled in the team, rather than lack of ability. Liverpool and City have proven over the past couple years what a winning mentality can do, coming from behind countless times, and scoring late as the will to win is there.
We as fans don't know what is said behind the scenes, and how Ole motivates his team, but if his Pre & post game interviews and demeanor on the touchline are any indication, its as scary as a Butterfly gently landing on your forearm, lightly fluttering its wings as you politely shoo it away. There has never been a sense of anger, never been a sight of frustration as he continuously smiles in light of embarrassing losses. Stark contrast to the negative attitude and confrontational style of Jose, however equally as negative to the progression of the team. The lack of leadership on the pitch is now equaled with a lack of strong leadership off the pitch. With the signing of Harry Maguire however, there is hope as he has been handed the armband, and can be for United the commanding figure of a Rio Ferdinand, which the club needs badly.

Coaching

The bigger problem however lays with the United players & coaching and of late, its medical staff. Many a game fans have witnessed players on the pitch playing more misplaced passes than ever before, lack of communication, lack of attacking movement, uncertainty in defense, and the constant deployment of ineffective tactics and formations without change. The board cannot be blamed for this. The passing and movement of the players can be of world class caliber, and has been demonstrated on occasion against high profile opposition. The boys can play football. Why is it that when they square up against the teams in the bottom half, there is a definite drop in ability? The coaching along with motivation seems to be lacking. The tactics deployed remain largely unchanged game to game, and only small changes to the lineup taking place. The selection at times has come in for major criticism, with some sympathy for the players available at his disposal, but the starts given to Pereira, Lingard, Jones, Matic, Young and Mata have been criticized more times than not. There have been calls for Angel Gomes to start more, or Mason Greenwood to oust Lingard from the lineup, but who are we the fans to make those calls? Have we seen these lads in training, and know their true ability to play in a full 90 min game? Do we know if they possess the stamina that Ole wants or requires, and their commitment to defending? Probably not, as we haven't seen enough of either, but what Lingard and Pereira have given is effort, if not anything else. That being said, I do support a change if what is being done doesn't work, which Ole has been apprehensive to do. Playing time, is the biggest factor in creating great form for players, as we see clearly with the resurgence of Fred as a general in the midfield, Mata as a creative genius, and Matic as the enforcer in the middle of the park. Each player at points in the season have been lambasted by fans, and demanded that they be sold, only to have a run of games and find form. 

The Players
This group cannot go without blame. Most if not all have been on the receiving end of harsh criticism and hate mail and although sometimes a bit much, ultimately warranted. The players at the end of the day are paid handsomely to perform their job. At the end of the day these are employees of the club. Paid to perform at the highest level. With misplaced passing, fitness levels visibly low, bad decision making and lack of determination being seen week in week out, part of the blame must lie with the players. Missed attempts happen, and passes go astray at all clubs, and can be forgiven if results were positive, but as the losses pile up, something has to give. Invisible performances from Jesse Lingard, distracted attempts from De Gea, ineffective appearances from Andreas Pereira are down to the players more than anything else. The simplest of tasks seems far out of reach for most, leading to the brightest sparks being the most inexperienced. Williams and Greenwood are the epitome of what a winning mentality can do, and is something not being replicated by the others on the pitch. These players have to want it, more than what Ole can inspire, these players should be, and need to be determined to win, and prove worthy of wearing the badge on their chest.

Fans

Touched on lightly in the points above, the Manchester United fan base has to take a large part of the blame for the clubs demise. The lack of support, booing of players, scheduling of walk outs, social media attacks on players and performance, calling for the sack for managers often a year in due to a string of bad results, is a plague that is only getting worse. Of course the fans have a right to be frustrated, and demand better performances. This is Manchester United after all. Accustomed to caviar and lobster, its a long fall from grace to be eating curried crab and dumpling. But this is football. This happens. The process and rebuilding is not made easier by over anxious fans who want a quick fix. The fans who have stopped watching games, stopped purchasing merchandise, and who have dismissed the ability of the team to defeat opponents, airing a sense of negativity never before seen has brought the club to a new low. There is no belief anymore, the chanting in Old Trafford has become muted, and the excitement for games has been diminished to levels unbecoming of a top 4 club, let alone the current most successful club in English Premier league history. The constant cries for a player to be benched, and then the cries for that player to be picked when his replacement underperforms, is a clear example. The demanding of players on transfer who fans have no idea the contract situation or willingness to sell by the club is laughable. The bandwagonism of fans to join in on Glazers out chants without knowing the impact is confusing. 

Its a long road to the top, and as the clubs name says, we should remain "UNITED", however the current state has led to a feeling of disorganization, depression, confusion and United only in expressing negativity and dismay. Ole may not be the man for the job, but is seemingly trying his best with what he has, in the most demanding of positions. He has a lot to learn, and improve on, and glimpses of it have been shown, but more consistency is needed from him, and his players. As the club clears out deadweight, and brings in players of a certain ilk, Ole seems to be the man who can bring the voices back to the Stretford End to chant the famous lyrics of Glory Glory rather than the sorry chants of Glazers Out. Will he get the chance to do so, or will the pressure of fans again win, and a new manager be appointed, to request a new set of players to join the already mix matched batch of talent currently at the club. I for one don't know what will happen, but I share the sentiment of a return to glory for my beloved Red Devils, more so now in the new found glory of our bitter rivals LiVARpool. "The night is dark and full of terror" but I have faith that our day will return, once we remain UNITED forever.

Van Gallows

Out of the Champions League on the last minutes of matchday 6, dismissed from the League Cup on penalties and 4th place in the EPL. Not exactly a familiar position for the Red Devils to be in at Mid December. 

United fans have now adopted the point of view of many of the minnows of the EPL such as Crystal Palace or West Brom in the constant berating of their manager, and calls for a new leader after 23 years* of no complaint under the legend that is Sir Alex. The style of play, philosophy, interviews, tactical decisions and even transfer policy of the managers in the post-Fergie era, have come under harsh scrutiny from the United faithful.

 Although its not beyond anyone to sympathize with the 55,000 Old Trafford season ticket holders, who have paid a small fortune to guarantee they can see their team every week, and at the very least be entertained. It is of no surprise therefore, that with the consistent listless displays, the travelling and paying fans will begin to voice their displeasure.   

The question however remains, can a manager replicate or replace Fergie? Many fans were adamant that LVG was the man to bring United back from the lows experienced under Moyes. The same fans who were happy and overjoyed with his appointment, are now the most vocal in calling for the sack. No doubt unhappy at the displays week in week out from a team bereft of confidence, flair and a will to win, but at this point, what can be said to defend his position and his plans,when there seems to be overwhelming evidence that the board should give him the boot. 

I personally think it is important to look at what it means to replace Fergie, and remember his time at the club. Any fan who is calling for the sack of a manager who has guided the club back to champions league play (albeit getting knocked out of a seemingly easy group) and is currently sitting in 4th place in the league may need to reflect for a second on what expectations they have, and how these expectations came to be. So looking firstly at Fergie's Reign, then LVG's appointment, and his reasons to be sacked, followed by reasons to see out the season. 

Fergie's Reign

1. The first 4 seasons

The reign of the great Sir Alex is fondly remembered as probably the greatest reign of any manager for any club, period. With his overall trophy collection during his reign eclipsing most clubs total collection outright. But true fans, or fans with a little knowledge will remember that those 26+ years weren't all glitz and glamour. In fact, the first four seasons as manager, Fergie had only once finished in the top 10, and if not for that famous Mark Robins goal against Forest (and subsequent victory) in the FA Cup, he may well have been on his way out the door. "Three years of excuses.. Tara Fergie", a famous banner that was seen at many points during his fourth season still serves as a reminder of the dark point in his career, with a humbling 5-1 defeat to City and home loss to Crystal Palace in the same 4th season pushing fans to the their boiling point. Imagine if the United board did listen to the whining fans, and give Fergie the sack. What would have become of Manchester United? A club to have only ever won the English Top Division under 3 managers. Who else can replicate the standards put forward by the great Sir Alex? In contrast to the start of Fergie, LVG has come in and taken a team from 7th place, back up to Champions League qualification in one season, and thereabout at the halfway point in his second season.

2. The Bar being set Astronomically High

At the end of his 26 year reign, Fergie managed to lift United past rivals Liverpool in the Premier League trophy tally, and guide the club to numerous other accolades along the way. The fans during this period have become used to, the champagne popping, trophy laden end of a season that came with Fergie. Anything less than this is seen as not only unacceptable, but intolerable. This of course created an extremely high standard, that is not unjust or unwarranted, but is LVG really out of line to state that the clubs fans need to tone down their expectations? Can the fans really expect someone to fill in for Fergie, right after he has left?  Of course, some will call for examples such as Real Madrid post Del Bosque or Barcelona post Pep, but besides spending 200 million a transfer window on World Class players itching to play for them, and owning Lionel Messi respectively, are these clubs really the examples to use? Have they not dipped in form after such a manager has left the club?Which leads to the third point under the Fergie era;

3. The squad left behind
Sir Alex was one of a kind. He had a way of motivating, and providing opportunity for players to become something greater than they were destined to be. He could take an average midfielder or defender, and have them play seemingly world class week in week out. He was able to make a player fit into a Team, and never look out of place. United had built an aura. An unbeatable aura, a fear factor so to speak, which quickly disappeared under Moyes. The same aura which has seemingly disappeared from Chelsea. It is difficult for players and the team overall to compete when this has left them. 

Fergie left the club in a dire position. Winning the league by over 10 points in his final season yes, but with aging legs, alienated players, and a dying youth system. The likes of Rio Ferdinand, Vidic and Evra, all seemed to be on their last legs during the early part of Moyes' tenure. Not to mention the purchase of raw but unpolished talent such as Chris Smalling and Phil Jones, and a shell of a midfield. His youth program dealing no serious first team starters since the Fledglings, and the two brightest prospects from the youth system in decades, allowed to slip through his grasp (Pogba & Morrison). LVG has been quite active in giving youth their chance, albeit due to an injury crisis, but nonetheless we have for the first time in a long time, seen youth play such a part in a teams premier league campaign.

LVG Era

1. His Promise

Those who are even remotely in tune with any managerial position in any industry may have an idea of what a job description is, and how contracts these days are drawn up. Managers are often given objectives or criteria to meet in order to be properly assessed on their performance. Louis Van Gal, upon appointment made some very optimistic, yet needed goals in a 3 year plan of his tenure. These goals or objectives to be graded on were:

 - Guide the club back to Champions League football within one season.

 - Guide the club back to Premier League glory within three seasons.

 - Introduce young United players and integrate them into the first team squad.

 - Reduce the hefty wage bill and shift out dead wood that Fergie/Moyes persevered with.

 - Turn around United's woeful defense, into a considerable force.

 - Steady the ship so to speak, allowing the club to maintain the status as one of the powerhouses of        World football.

Care to dispute any of the above thus far?

 Every United fan heard of these stipulations & promises, from the day he signed on the dotted line. Knowing these items were on the agenda, everyone was pleased with the appointment of this new manager who was seen as a step up from David Moyes. An experienced manager, with many accolades to his name, after managing top clubs such as Barcelona, Bayern and Ajax as well as national team experience. How then has the opinion of these fans changed so drastically so quickly?

2. LVG way of football management 

The thorn in the side of any United fan, is basically the "boring" style of play that has now almost become the norm with Manchester United. 0-0 draws is now the odds on scoreline before any game pre whistle. Not the United way. In the Fergie era especially, United were known for their attacking drive, their "never say never" attitude, and their ability to bag goals at any point, but more often than not, in the dregs of a game. Being behind was never seen as a problem, and fans in Old Trafford or at home, would stay glued to the game until the final whistle. 

This however has seemed to have faded if not totally disappeared from the club philosophy and style of play. LVG has changed the way the club plays, and seemingly turned the club from an attacking, counter attacking based football club to a possession based club. His rigid rules, and philosophy taking its toll on the relationship with players and fans. Never before have the club seen such disputes with players and manager as they have under Van Gal. Or have they? It comes as a surprise to me to hear the discontent of United fans in the way LVG manages players, after coming out of the Fergie era. An era where Fergie not only fell out famously with numerous players and agents, but rarely ever backed down, and ultimately got rid of said players. Now fans are somewhat surprised, and sympathetic to the plight of Victor Valdez, a third string keeper who refuses to play for the reserves, and Javier Hernandez who was told he had no future of the club and rightly so. What fans must understand is that having the passion for the club does not deem you deserving of wearing the shirt, otherwise Falcao would still be at the club. Yes Chicha is bagging the goals for Bayer, as a starter, but given the same opportunity at United, it is highly unlikely he would have such returns, as we have seen before. It is a similar situation to Diego Forlan unfortunately. Could not perform as a consistent starter for United, but upon leaving the club, instantly becomes a top scorer in his new league and club. Its the way the game is. Lets move on. 

3. Results 

Putting the style of play aside, and going on the basis of results alone, I've been left scratching my head at the calls for the sack of LVG. There has been one heavy defeat all season, the 3-0 drubbing by Arsenal and only two other losses in the league to Swansea and Bournemouth both being by a 1 goal margin. 

In contrast, a 3-1 win over Liverpool, 0-0 draw with city, 1-0 win over Tottenham, 3-2 win over Southampton, 3-0 win over Everton are all results I as a fan, am proud of, regardless of boring or excitement lacking manner in which they were won. Fans have more than ever called for the sack after the 2-1 loss to Bournemouth, as if it is unheard of to lose to such opposition. As if the fans have forgotten results of the past 25 years, as if the club has never lost a game to a newly promoted team. And in this instance, United fielded a team of youngsters. A team where the average age of the defense was 21, due largely in part to injury. 

Perspective. 

United have lost 3 games in the EPL. They have conceded the least amount of goals thus far, yet are only 7th in the league in goals scored. The problem is apparent. Lack of attacking verve. Not for a lack of trying, but the finishing has not been on point. Fingers have been pointed to Wayne Rooney, Martial and even the midfield which has not contributed the numbers one would expect. 

Missing out on the knockout stages of the Champions League also saw the calls for lynching of Van Gal. A seemingly easy group on paper, caused all sorts of trouble for United, and in the last 15 minutes of the match-day, United's fate was sealed with a third place finish. The positives at least for me coming out of the final game against Wolfsburg, was the all too familiar attacking drive we were used to, the free flowing push up the field, the will to win, which unfortunately was not enough to secure promotion. A classic case of too little too late. 

But it seems that this is the first time in history, that United have failed to make it out the group stage, or so the fans would have you believe. The 94', 05' or 2011 exits at the same hurdle, all seemingly forgotten and forgiven. These previous failings, all against seemingly easy on paper opposition. Basel, Benfica and Otelul Galati??? Villareal, Benfica, Lille??? 

Conclusion

After rambling for over 3000 words, if you've reached this far, I apologize for the rant, and the apparent lack of structure to that article that was written in pace and in frustration. It is difficult to ascertain I'm sure, my stance on LVG, although my many points defending him may seem to outweigh the reasons for him to leave. 

At no point would I say that I am overjoyed, or happy at the way United are currently playing. I will not admit I am happy at the exit of the Champions League (although relieved, as a meeting against Barcelona/Madrid/Bayern/PSG could have set the club back ages) or happy with the standing in the league. But I will defend a process that is in place under his regime. A process that fell by the wayside under Moyes, and a structure that was built back by LVG. A rigid team structure, possession based football, a back-line that seems to keep a clean sheet more times than not and a team that follows instructions while incorporating youth into the fray. 

. 

The foundation has been laid. I personally am of the opinion that LVG should leave his position at the end of the season, but firmly believe that the calls for his head at this point are slightly unfair, if going on his promises, and the position of the club, taking into consideration all the injuries he is faced with at the current moment. 

I have personally seen the "New Fans" of the club, (fan boys from 06/07 to present) being the most vocal in calls for his removal, and restoration of the "United Brand" of football. Overcompensating no doubt for their inexperience and lack of history with the club, but damaging the club all the same. Calls for a manager's removal during a season, when the season is not in jeopardy, can only delve the club into such. 

It is for this reason I implore the fans of United to stop the whining for now. Three defeats in the league, honestly is no reason to plead for a managers removal. I can be proven wrong, and for all I know, may already be on his way before Christmas, but to me, let us see what he can do as players come back from injury, and we have an impending transfer window to maybe do some business. The way the other top teams are performing are an instant reminder that it is not as easy as it looks, but are giving us a lifeline to complete the season in the top 4. 

Hold the faith in the club for a little while longer, and upon his completion of the season, we can and will do business to bring in a manager who can build on the foundation set, and reinstate the attacking mentality that the club so craves. 

The Golden Ball or Golden Blunder

                                    

With millions of fans entering hibernation for another 4 years, us fanatics are in a familiar waiting period of constant speculation on clubs wheeling and dealings before the start of their respective pre-season tours. The World Cup, as promised boasted goals, amazing saves, drama and moments of tactical genius that we all longed for. But as the final whistle blew and we thought it was all over, we were treated to yet another debatable topic, the Golden Ball award, reserved for the player who performed the best throughout the Cup, was gifted to arguably the greatest player the sport has ever seen.

Whats wrong with this you might ask? Only that by and large the footballing world believes that he does not deserve this award, for his displays throughout the competition, namely the group stage format. Countless calls of "rigging" or "scandal" rang out as he was presented with the award, with almost a handful of more deserving candidates standing only a matter of meters away. The ruthless, and disciplined Germans watched on as the Messiah collected the award, and maybe a few felt they were more deserving. Facebook seemed the outlet for most of the frustration however, as my news feed turned into a who's who of football experts chiming in with their vote for who should have received the award. Claims of Tim Howard due to one spectacular game in particular surprisingly seen in a few posts had my head in my hands within seconds. With the outlandish suggestions brought forward, it had me wondering really if anybody really watched the performance of Messi in this World Cup, or did they just go to watch matches with friends while drinking beers and small talking while paying attention only to the "exciting or attacking" moments within each game.

We collectively have been blessed to witness in our lifetime arguably two of the greatest footballers there has ever been, in Lionel Messi and Cristiano Ronaldo (had to put him in there guys). In my opinion, it is this blessing which has cursed us. Have we become ungrateful or desensitized to the simple intricacies involved in Lionel Messi's football ability? Has his past proficiency in front of goal made us expect so much more on the Worlds greatest stage? Have we overlooked what a player is to a team, and sacrifice one makes for the progression of said team? I watched this World Cup mostly in the comfort of my home, and in the office, missing only one or two matches which could not be helped, choosing the simple silence over constant banter during the game so as to study the positioning of players, the role they played and formations used.
                            
This allowed me to witness the brilliance of players many would overlook in favor of those who steal the limelight due to a quick dribble or brilliant finish that they didn't expect. James Rodriguez for example who scored amazing goals, and earned the Golden Boot award for his 5 goals scored in the tournament can be used as an example. To many football fans, he is no newcomer and his talents have been known, but not the extent he displayed at the Cup. Only becoming a starter at Porto with the departure of Falcao, Hulk and Guarin, Rodriguez developed into quite a footballer, commanding a transfer fee of 40 Million Euros to move to Monaco. The fact that his performance was so unexpected, led many football fan to overlook his instances of failure, or disappearance from a game, in favor of his positives throughout. A luxury not afforded to the great Lionel Messi, who although scored 4 goals and provided a crucial assist has been criticized widely for his absence or lack of "influence" in the 7 games he played 90 minutes of in the Cup.

Football fans, myself included, have always held the notion that until he can win a World Cup, Messi will always be in the shadow of Diego Maradona. A player with the same physique, ability and talent of the same country, with the same aura and menacing dribbling technique, only 2  decades before, who was able to carry his nation to successive World Cup finals lifting it on one occasion, almost single handedly. It is this image, this notion that we expected such greatness from Messi that we overlooked his abilities on the pitch. Maradona showed just what a World Cup trophy can accomplish.. Instant Glory, and the power to have  indiscretions and poor performances overlooked, due to the blinding light of the trophy's golden rays. Nobody ever makes mention of the poor 1990 performance, and his doping allegations, with the only memory fans seem to remember is his Hand of God, or slalom run against England.

For my money, maybe the award should have gone to players such as Manuel Neuer, Phillip Lahm, Thomas Muller, Arjen Robben, James Rodriguez or even Javier Mascherano. The choice to give Messi however, was not totally unfounded and in my opinion should not have been met with such uproar and immediate disagreement. Stats don't lie, and they also dont measure a players influence. Without Messi would Argentina have reached the final? Without his driving runs in the group stage, (which salvaged points for his team when needed), without him pulling 3 or 4 defenders at a time and hold them off long enough to feed the likes of Angel Di Maria, would Argentina have made the final? Did anyone take notice of this or was it just the norm, what we have come to expect from Messi? Is it because Argentina had what many would describe as an easy route to the final that his goals and displays not be counted? Is this why it came as such a surprise to many that he won the award?

Messi dropped deeper than we have seen him in recent years, sacrificed himself on numerous occasions and strove for collective glory of his teammates rather than individual, which by all accounts could have been so easy. As Jose Mourinho pointed out, it would have been easy for him to play a Robben role or a Muller role and stay up top waiting to receive and then dazzle on the counter, without helping in defense and he would have done this twice as effectively as Robben if he did, but this was not the case. Messi performed a duty, knowing that his midfield could not create as well as they should, and knowing that their defense was not as strong as most others, dropped deep, and became a play maker, a work horse, an outlet for his defenders to confidently pass to.

He single-handedly inspired and drove when given the opportunity as we have come to expect him to. Truly a person who "Carried" his team and inspired his nation once again to believe.

As pointed out by a truly amazing article that I read yesterday by Jen Evelyn, football fans of my age and younger only have the highlight reels of Maradona or Pele which highlight their greatness, and never show their mistakes, whereas Messi's are there plain for all to see every week over 60 times a year, and it is for this that Messi has lost in my opinion some of his God Like appeal today, which seemingly will only be regained once he has left the sport.

Messi had a great world cup by footballing standards, and a poor world cup by Messi standards, and it is for this reason many cannot accept that he deserved the award, myself included. But it is only by truly understanding the pressures he had, the simplicity with which he played, and the sacrifice he offered that we can truly appreciate his awarding or even nomination for the award. Again, his humility in defeat, and strength in not shedding a tear, which seems to be the new trend/embodiment of passion in the sport showed me a true great, a man whose disappointment at his falling at the last hurdle was highlighted tenfold by his sad demeanor rather than a decision to shed tears on the ground being consoled by teammates as so many players opt to do nowadays. As he made the long, lonely and unwanted journey up the stairs of the Maracana to receive the award, walking past the World Cup trophy on his way, Lionel would be the first person to tell you that maybe he did not deserve it, and should have been given to another on the same field that night. Such is the class of the Messiah.

 Im not trying to convince or agree that he deserved the award, (as many friends know I am not a Messi Fan per say #CR7) but merely putting into perspective, that he was definitely justified in contention for the award, and by his subtleties in his displays, deserves recognition as such.

WORLD CUP TALKING POINTS

Only an event such as the World Cup can spark the necessary encouragement for me, to once again dabble in journalism to convey my thoughts on the hot topics of the day. We have so far bore witness to what many 20 to 30 somethings have described as the "best world cup they have seen so far" due much in part to the free flowing attacking football we witnessed in the group stage, as well as handful of match winning performances from close to 7 different goalkeepers. No doubt that we have seen some truly amazing goals thus far, namely Tim Cahill's volley, Robin Van Persie's flying header an James Rodriguez's chest control swivel and volley, yet the performances and subsequent saves we have witnessed from the goalkeepers has been rivaled in numbers only by the number of "bandwagonists" for Brazil.

There are however a couple of talking points in this world cup which I felt the need to analyze and voice my opinion a bit for those "new found" football fans who have successfully decreased my social media time due to my attempts to avoid reading the "various expert" opinions and post game analysis, which seek to raise my blood pressure to a dangerous level of instability. I of course am no expert myself, but do think my credibility is a bit higher than those who tune in to watch a few games every 4 years. I apologize in advance for grammatical errors as I have not written an article such as this in a little over two years.

Last Gasp Sam-aras and the "supression" of African Teams

The injury time decision by referee Vera of Ecuador was met my opposition by scores of "football fans" who at first glance felt Georgios had play acted in the dying stages to earn the spot kick. The unlucky culprit was Giovanni Sio who made a lazy attempt to throw Samaras off his shot by placing his leg in the path of Samaras's strike (clear goal-scoring opportunity) causing the striker to clip his own leg an subsequently fall down with claims of a foul. Rightly so, as being a striker myself, would have claimed the same as Sio made no attempt to play the ball, and caught the Greek on his swing, a foul anywhere on the pitch.

I have linked this incident, as seen in the title to claims in the aftermath of the incident to the continued suppression of African teams by FIFA and their referee's due to the matter of "race". I don't think I need to touch too much into this, as this is obviously a touchy subject for some, but in my humble opinion it is unfair to blame the continuous shortcomings of the African teams on the world stage on the refs and FIFA. Reference to the Suarez handball against Ghana came up to my surprise. Said incident was dealt with correctly, as a penalty was given, player was red carded and banned, and Ghana's fate was left in their own hands. Not much more could have been done within the rules of the game and although unfortunate for the Ghanaians and in the current world cup, the Ivory Coast no true football fan can blame FIFA for the non progression of African teams. I myself can cast blame on the inexperience (lazy extra time tackle in the box), infighting within the teams (namely Cameroon and Ghana) and various Football federations and the desire for most players of these teams to showcase their individual performance for hopes of being offered contracts at bigger clubs rather than work as a team, to me are the main reasons we have yet to bear witness to an African team in the final.
(I would like to point out this holds true for many teams, and is not limited to just African teams, however in my opinion aided in the downfall and poor performance of Cameroon, Ghana and Ivory Coast.)

Rise of Concacaf Pedigree
 Costa Rica, Mexico and USA have shown the World that Concacaf teams are no longer to be considered the "beat up on" teams in the groups. The surprise package of the tournament, Costa Rica, who managed to beat the odds and top the group which held the likes of Uruaguay, England and Italy, all previous World Cup Winners, and surge to the Quater Finals losing on penalties, only sought to strengthen the rise in ability of Concacaf nations, and seemingly brought a sense of "unity" among the supporters from the region. I found myself cheering on the likes of Mexico and Costa Rica who I normally would not wish to see progress due to rivalry with my own Nation of Trinidad. I however had mixed emotions with the USA as they are a team I really never had a fondness for but had to concede after their dramatic loss to Belgium that  they did the region proud and have grown into a world force not to be taken lightly.

Water Breaks, shaving cream technology and the officials

Many football fans, myself included have been against the institution of the "water-break" imposed for certain matches in this years World Cup. Rightly so, as football has been played for over 100 years, in conditions exactly as what is being experience in Brazil and has survived without the need for additional water breaks just before the half time period. However, although not a fan of it, I do understand the need for it, as the temperatures partnered with the humidity levels for the matches it was used in saw a risk of dangerous levels of dehydration and fatigue for those players not accustomed to the climate in Brazil. If a player suffered a heat stroke on the field during a match we would all be screaming that the there should have been measures in place to assist and ensure the players physical safety. Many persons have argued that this water break serves to give an advantage for the European teams who are not accustomed to the climate, however this is not the case. The same opportunity has been given to the other team in the match, much in the same way in cold climates, players are allowed to wear long sleeves, gloves, beanies if need be. To me, if water breaks are to be taken away in such conditions, then why not ban the use of gloves and thermal clothing. food for thought.

On that note however, we have seen the successful and welcome use of the "shaving cream" or magic foam and goal line technology which has benefited the game greatly. Change sometimes is good for the sport.

The Neymar assassination

 Or so Social media would make it seem, with posts of such passion at the loss of Neymar through injury has had me searching to find out if his career had somehow been cut short by a very common knee to the back. Obviously Neymar is the darling of Brazil, and with 97% of Trinidadians adopting Brazil as their second nationality for the month long tournament his loss came as a shock, and was met with anger and despair. It truly is a loss for the football community, as we will not be able to see him showcase his talents for the remainder of the tournament, and obviously no one im sure wished that he would be ruled out in such cruel fashion, however the witch hunt underway for Zuniga (the offender) I believe is overboard and unwarranted. Maybe Zuniga's challenge was a little more intentional than he let on, but by no means do I think he truly meant to damage Neymar to that extent. As such, tackles 10 times worse, and 100 times more intentional happen every game and is no surprise to the regular football viewer. Many of these incidents are met with little to no punishment and this incident to me should not be treated differently just because its Neymar. apparent investigations by FIFA into the incident are unwarranted, and unfair due to the thousands of worse challenges that take place every season.That being said, hope he gets well as he is definitely going to be one of the greatest players ever to wear the Brazil strip.

Caravans, Wagons and Buses
In closing, I must applaud the new levels of wagon-ism witnessed during this World Cup where I have seen with my own eyes Portuguese supporters of 4 years ago, donning the blue of Italy at the start of the tournament, and subsequently changing to the orange of Holland halfway through. I have witnessed avid Barcelona and Spain fans who claim to have supported "since birth" become quiet for a day or two with the elimination of their beloved team, before emerging wearing the yellow of Brazil whilst name dropping players of old who they may have heard pop up in conversation to prove they are true fans.
Nothing wrong with this of course, and I may receive some stick and comments asking whats wrong with supporting a team that is likely to win, and the fact of the matter nothing is. Whats wrong is when these "fans" claim to be supporting for years, and drop wikipedia searched facts in an attempt to highlight their "knowledge" and true patriotism for their club/country.

All in all, a long ramble yes, but just shed some light on some of the hot topics of debate, and put in my two cents for the purpose of debate and friendly banter.

I like my hands Shaken not stirred !

With the media circus still centered on the big “Racist debate” many Liverpool and general United haters have made it a point to let me know exactly what they thought about the debacle.

What’s surprising is that in a matter that deals with racial abuse there still remains such a divided standpoint by football fans. As many anti-United fans would quickly point out, “Racism aside”, this is about the handshake which Suarez was under no obligation to make. Racism aside???? How can you put the main cause of the incident aside? So I guess Anti-Semitism aside Hitler wasn’t that bad of a guy? Am I saying that Suarez is Hitler? Of course not, I’m merely suggesting that people must open their eyes and see that the situation at hand is deep rooted with racism and should not be overlooked.

Now the anti-united fans will be jumping up saying “But Suarez wasn’t racist, there was a miss communication or lost in translation type issue because he is Spanish, and has black friends and teammates.” Really? This is your defense? A statement made by Suarez with the obvious intent to abuse and upset Evra can be excused because he said it in Spanish? The loose translation of “tu es negro” is understood to be “you are black” and has been confirmed by Suarez. Does this now mean that what he said was not racist? If you believe so I think you should seriously rethink and do some readings on what racism is, and the effects and instances of racism in the past.

The problem here is that Trinidadians outlook will be slightly different to that of an Englishman. In Trinidad racism is expected and much more prevalent than in the UK. I myself being a minority in the country experience being called much worse than “white boy” on a daily basis. Do I let this bother me? Or become enraged with constant stereotyping that is associated with being white? No I do not, but that does not mean that such comments and remarks are not racist or are not wrong. They very much are. In this instance should Patrice maybe have kept quiet and not let something like those comments affect him? Should he have said nothing and went on about his day? Maybe, but I believe Evra’s decision to bring to light the racist remarks are justified, and in my opinion encouraged.

This causes another debate of how can we know if the racist claims are justified or not just a way for a footballer to seek attention and incite punishment on someone they may not particularly like? And for that I may not have an answer short of putting microphones on the player’s shirts. However, in the case of Mr. Suarez, he admitted to the allegations and confessed that he did say what was reported, be it that he meant it differently. That’s where most anti-united fans should have lost their defense much as Suarez did in the hearing.

Now I am aware that on field banter and mind games play a big part in the outcome of a game, and in a longstanding rivalry such as the case with Liverpool and United some form of rapport is expected and even encouraged by the viewers and fans who love the added competitiveness and combativeness. However a line must be drawn on what is said to a player. Those who are still reading this and believe “black” not to be derogatory or racist, when issued towards a person of said skin color in a way that made him feel inferior, needs a serious reality check.

The issue of the handshake is a long winded debate on sportsmanlike principles vs. personal choice. On one hand it’s not written in any rule book that each player must shake hands before the match, but it is understood, and is a tradition that must be respected. Suarez’s decision to avoid the outstretched hand of Patrice Evra condemned him to a life of ridicule and shame to Liverpool football club. Some have defended saying he was right because Evra caused him to receive an 8 game ban, and $40,000 fine. Really? Was this Evra’s fault? A man deciding to stand up to racism is at fault? Or is the decision of Suarez to attack Evra’s skin color wrong? If u side with Suarez still then I ask you to seriously consider what type of person you are.

Liverpool fans will now say that “Suarez’s ignored handshake is just as bad as Evra’s celebration at the end of the game” Really? A man who has been subjected to being called a “girl” for standing up to racism and then ignored a handshake by his offender who just so happens to play for his club’s biggest rivals? His celebrations at the end were unsportsmanlike? How?? At most I can admit his celebrations were a bit over the top, but by no means was it unwarranted.

To me, the bottom line here is that a racist remark was made. Weather you choose to support Suarez for his choice of words and decision to not shake hands, or support Evra for his decision to shake hands, and stand up to racism the point is, this could all have been avoided and ended if Suarez would have shook Evra’s hand. Hell, even throw in a hug and a gentle tap on the shoulder and Mr. Suarez could have avoided a hell of a lot of problems for himself and his club and manager and maybe even brought a much needed lighter side to the current situation.

Decisions come back to haunt us, and in the end, maybe some of the criticism for Mr. Suarez has been over the top. In the heat of the game, much worse has been said, and ignored, and this will continue in the future. Suarez already had a target on his back, and will always continue to, and as such maybe should have known better after living in England for over a year that comments such as that are deemed racist, and are outlawed in the modern game.

Do I think Suarez is a racist? Maybe not, but his racist remarks will always have him labeled as one and this is no one’s fault but his own, and something that he will have to live with for a long time to come. His punishment was just and deserved, and much as jail time should be a reflection period for those who commited a crime, that 8-game ban should have been more than enough time for Suarez to come to grips with what he did, and therfore be a Big man and shake the hand of who he offended.

Wayne Rooney seemed to have put it best with his twitter comment reading, “"It's not for us to comment on. It's for them to sort out” and maybe this is better left at that.

Crisis in Paradise

As almost every rival football fan laughed in unison at the tragic scenes that unfolded in Basel, the shell shocked United supporters could only stare at the ground in disbelief and disappointment.

In a season that started so promisingly, a visit from their noisy cross town neighbors seems to have altered their course for the remainder of the season. Trailing City by 5 points, losing to Crystal Palace in the League Cup and now bowing out in the group stage of the Champions League in seemingly the easiest group there was, it can’t get any worse for the mighty Manchester United. Or can it?

Midfield Dilemma?

With the retiring of the Legend that is Paul Scholes, the Red Devils lost that all important midfield talisman that would ensure there longevity in the Domestic and European campaign. Sir Alex always knew that the day would come when Scholsey would call it a day, and had more than enough time to find a replacement.

This panic was felt also by millions of fans, as they called for Fergie to sign a world class player to fill the gap that Scholes left behind. With the Scot claiming that he would dive into the transfer market, there was a real sense of intrigue around Old Trafford as the rumor mill started churning out new prospects every hour. The most intriguing saga of which involved one Wesley Sneijder.

The Dutch midfield maestro was seemingly ready to leave Inter, and Manchester seemed the only destination that tickled his fancy. But with a price tag of a private jet, and monthly wages equal to a yearly budget of Macedonia it would serve to be a major stumbling block for the move. Add in Darren Fletchers mystery illness and niggling injuries to Antonio Valencia and Michael Carrick, the midfield options at the beginning of the season seemed thin, and there were definite calls for a replacement of quality.

Enter a Cleverly Crafted Solution

As the season started, there was a definite anxiousness around Old Trafford. No big name signing to show for, no Scholes and an abundance of young players with little to no experience.

Up steps Tom Cleverly and the previously inconsistent Anderson. Sir Alex favoring the pair to start the season instead of purchasing a BIG name world class midfielder. Would it work? The answer, an unequivocal YES! The midfield duo, partnered with stellar performances from Welbeck, Nani, Rooney and Young provided United fans with an excitement they so rarely felt since the free flowing days of Ronaldo.

United were quick out the gate, with amazing one touch football, and smooth flowing attack, partnered with smart and agile defending. The team went on a great goal scoring run crushing Arsenal 8-1, beating Man City to the Community Shield and causing teams across Europe to take notice. Fergie had done it again and formed another “team” worthy of challenging Europe’s elite clubs.

Injuries expose lack of depth & Poor Selection

Sitting pretty and playing well, Fergie looked smug as usual chewing his gum as his team were not only getting results, but looking quite attractive while doing so. Nothing could go wrong it seemed, until injuries started to pop up, like an epidemic of sorts at the club. Cleverly, Welbeck Vidic and Anderson all falling victim to injuries which saw the squad suddenly look thinner than ever, and that spark and chemistry that was the cause of their early season dominance was now gone.

United began playing sloppy, with careless passing, lack of urgency, and most importantly lack of creativity. The fans who were quiet for weeks began asking questions again as to why Fergie did not sign a midfield superstar. The likes of Fletcher and Carrick although familiar, lacked that connect with the forward line that we saw with Anderson and Cleverly. Injuries to these experienced players also led to a gap that Fergie tinkered with by playing a variety of players in said position. Rooney, Jones, Smalling and even Park all took up roles in the middle of the park in a horrible spell of games which saw them dumped out of 2 competitions, and lose ground in the league.

It was obvious that although the club played well at the start, most of those players that were responsible for this form, were sidelined and there was a need for something fresh, something creative, and something classy in the middle of the park.

Fergie was left with minimal options, but so strong was his belief in his young players that he decided to experiment with formation and selection in an attempt to regain the early season form and prove that he didn’t need another midfielder.

Unfortunately it didn’t work as City dealt united their worst home defeat in history, and the worst defeat under the Ferguson Era. Shrugged off as a once in a lifetime loss, United set about to bounce back and put that loss behind them, only it was easier said than done.

The goals seemingly dried up quick and with Europa League football on the horizon the season seems to be a bust as the City steamroller continues moving forward in lethal form.

Bottom Line

There are some things that United will need to learn from this experience.

1. Europe is by no means a place for experimentation. Fergie took the easiest group on paper and turned it into a fight to the last minute for a place in the second round. With a thin squad, and the season on the line United ill afford to waste points by playing weak teams and experimenting with different players in different positions.

2. Never underestimate your opponents. This goes hand in hand with the point above, and too many times we have seen United underestimate their opposition especially in Europe and come out empty handed. Buck up and field a strong team until your future is safe, then and only then can we emulate the great clubs of Europe such as Barca who fielded a youth team against BATE and won convincingly as there was no pressure.
   

3. Rooney needs help. Everyone needs help sometimes, and although there are times Wayne can put the team on his back and carry the club, every hero needs a sidekick. Aguero needs Silva, Messi needs Xavi, Higuain needs Ronaldo, and the list goes on. Rooney needs a midfielder than can give him the supply line to score the goals. Does that mean a superstar? Not necessarily. Im content to see quality like Wilshire or Ramsey come up as we have in Cleverly.
   

4. Experience is crucial and quality counts. The likes of Paul Scholes, Van der Sar, Neville etc having retired is starting to tell. Rio is no longer the able defender he once was, and Vidic is seemingly made of glass. There is a call for an experienced player to step up an pull together these young lads.
   

I like to think of myself as an Old School supporter who loves seeing players play for the club who love the club as much as I do. I believe we have found this in the past by buying players, such as Rooney, Evra, Ferdinand and Vidic but by and large big superstar signings is not a United trait. I love when the club targets young players with ambitions to win everything, and build up a loyalty to the club. This is something that I do not believe we can get by buying Snejider and fully stand by with Fergie’s decision to wait. It may not be the best season by any means but the future does hold promise barring any injuries. Big name signings will only seek to dwarf the development that Tom and Ando had shown, and drive the clubs finances further in the red.

It’s obvious that the club needs one or two players to bridge the gap and bring in much needed depth and competition, but the likes of a world class established midfielder is not in the United way. Pick up a young talented lad with a hunger for trophies, and a United mentality.

This isn’t the end by any means. The club is still sitting near the top of the table and has the prospect of recapturing that early season form at some point this season when all related parties are once again match fit. This will only seek to build character and make the younger ones stronger. I BELIEVE !!! UNITED!!!

And they're OFF !!

It has long been an idea of mine to put my predictions for upcoming matches down on paper, and explain my reasoning. This for the purpose of having proof after the result ends up the way I predicted it would. There is no way one can accurately predict outcomes of sporting fixtures consistently, and even more so for this years installment of the English Premier League, which will definitely be one to remember.

So I begin with the first round of fixtures. With the youth in England running riot everywhere, an stocking up on there latest brands and electronics for free, there was much speculation as to if the matches would be postponed, and luckily for most, only the Toffees vs Spurs match was in fact pushed back.

Blackburn Rovers vs Wolves (10:00am Trini Time)

Surely not the most eagerly anticipated match up for the round, this game will be a scrap fest, with Wolves running at the Rovers defence at pace, and Blackburn making good use of set pieces, with Mr. Pedersen being the main culprit of creating any goalscoring opportunity. I predict a 1-2 loss for the Rovers, who are likely to be without Samba or Nielsen, which leaves a weakened back line having already lost Phil Jones to United. Wolves looks a bit stronger in my opinion with Johnson coming in to boost the back line of the team. You can expect Hoillet to cause some problems and even get on the score sheet, whereas a good bet may be to look at Fletcher and Jarvis to put 1 in the goal column.

Fulham vs Aston Villa (10:00am Trini Time)

Two hard working teams to battle it out at the Cottage, with a return to the EPL on the cards for John Arne Riise. Fulham who in my opinion always look impressive will not have an easy game by any means, but the home field advantage, and absence of Young and Downing will definitely make things a little easier. Given in goal is always going to be a huge boost to a team, but with the lack of attack going forward he may be under more pressure than he would want for the first game of the season. I believe however that this match will be a 1-1 draw. Many fantasy leaguer's would have already picked up N'Zogbia and he can easily find himself on the score sheet, along with Bobby Zamora or Dempsey for Fulham.

Liverpool vs Sunderland (10:00am Trini Time)

This match up is between two completely new teams so to speak. With Sunderland making 10 additions to their team, and Liverpool adding an entirely new midfield, there is surely great interest from football fans, to see how these "new teams" will fare. Liverpool have gone on the offensive in the transfer market after they relinquished their throne as England's most successful club to rivals Manchester United. With Adam, Downing, Henderson and Doni coming in, few would bet against them posing a major title challenge. I however am more interested in Sunderland. I believe that this match will be a 3-2 win for Liverpool with the strength of their Attack being too much for a weak Sunderland back line to deal with. Sunderland will have the chance to cause an upset however, with their own midfield and striking revamp.

Qpr vs Bolton (10:00am Trini Time)

New boys QPR test their might against Wanderers. This is going to be a shocker, but I will put money on QPR to come away with a win from this one. DJ Campbell is a great addition to the attack, and Taarabat in the midfield pulling the strings will make it an easy time for QPR to get one in the win column. They will run out 2-0 winners on the day and set the tone for the promoted clubs.

Wigan vs Norwich City (10:00 Trini Time)

No need to get into a lenghty debate for this one. A draw is on the cards in my opinion with Norwich playing their hearts out in an attempt to stamp some sort of respect for the rest of their campaign. Only problem is that taking points from Wigan wont scare many teams just yet. 1-1 final score.

Newcastle vs Arsenal (12:30 Trini time)

Both these teams have a wealth of riches, and have made no substantial purchases that have made their fans happy. Newcastle being the busier of the two, signing 4 French boys and Ba, still look a weakened team without the likes of Carrol an Nolan, as well as impending departure of Enrique. Arsenal seem to be left wounded with the departures of Nasri and Fabregas in the works, but i however feel this can do more positive than harm. Fabregas was almost non existant last season as he continued to sulk about being unable to move to Barcelona. Nasri was in fine form and will be missed, but lets not forget Ramsey, Wilshire, Asharvin, Rosiky, Eboue, Diaby, RVP, Gervinho, Chamakh, Walcott are all in attack still and can play the Arsenal game. Arsenal will take this one 3-1.

Stoke City vs Chelsea ( 8:30 Sunday Trini Time)

Easy to decide as Chelsea will find it tough to break down the rough an tough Stoke team. A 1-1 Draw will be a shock to behold, and will steal headlines as no one would have expected Stoke to take points from the prem big boys. But this will happen, as Chelsea will be without the likes of Essien and Torres for the occasion.

West Brom vs Manchester United (11:00 am Sunday Trini Time)

The reigning champions will have an easy test on the opening day against WBA, and should have no problems dispatching them at the Hawthorns. The pace of Young, Nani, Rooney, Welbeck, Anderson will be all too much for WBA, and will be unable to prevent a 3-0 victory for the Red Devils. Cleverly will be used in the event that Carrick cannot make, and will be given an opportunity to showcase his talent.

Manchester City vs Swansea ( 2:00 pm Monday Trini Time)

City will overpower the new boys and will look good, but be powerless to cause problems for a strong City defensive line, and overpowering attack. Mario, Dzeko, Aguero and Silva will cause the most problems on the day, and Toure will pull the strings in the midfield. An easy 3-0 victory will be on the cards in my opinion. Look out for Routdledge to cause a bit of a menace, and Lita to be imposing on the defence however.

Again, my opinions are just that, and I open the floor to anyone who may have reasons why they believe the scores will be any different. I just hope my predicitons are correct, and that this season lives up to the hype as one of the most exciting yet!